ronde citta di sperlonga online dating - Buy bicycle speedometer online dating

KILLICK, John Reginald - CCA, 4.1.2002 - 127 A Crim R 273O'Keefe J, Smart AJR v Killick [2002] NSWCCA 1Sentence appeal.

Two indictments containing multiple charges: robbery; discharge firearm; escape; assault pilot; detain for advantage; steal MV.

CARROLL, Douglas John Frederick - CCA, Greg James & Whealy JJCitation: R v Carroll [2001] NSWCCA 511Sentence appeal.1 x BE&S; 1 x aggravated BE&S; 6 offences on a Form 1 (take & use conveyance; BE&S; possess housebreaking implements; possess explosive device; possess prohibited drug).5y 3m with NPP of 2y 3m. Aged 34y 9m at time of sentence - discount for guilty plea - special circumstances - positive steps towards rehabilitation - disproportion between head sentence & NPP.

buy bicycle speedometer online dating-68buy bicycle speedometer online dating-16buy bicycle speedometer online dating-61

The supply offences arose out of the supply of methylamphetamine to an undercover police officer on 5 occasions over a period of 10 days.

On 3 occasions the quantity supplied was half a gram for which applicant received $50 for each deal.

The other 2 deals each involved 7 grams for which applicant received $300 on each occasion.

Applicant was the proprietor of a service station in Cessnock.

STEVENS, Russell John - CCA, Spigelman CJ, Simpson J, Smart AJCitation: R v Stevens [2001] NSWCCA 330Conviction and sentence appeal.

Maliciously inflict GBH; supply prohibited drug (25.53 grams methylamphetamine); a charge of possess cannabis leaf taken into account. From the wrong side of the road, appellant overtook a car driven by victim's wife.

Because hair follicles, sweat glands & sebaceous glands have been destroyed, she has problems with temperature control. Guilty plea - 'worst case'category - whether sentencing error - R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 - contrition - subjective features - weight given. BIKIC, Ned - CCA, Giles JA, Sully & Levine JJCitation: R v Bikic [2001] NSWCCA 537Conviction appeal.1 x murder; 1 x manslaughter.

(See R v Bikic [2001] NSWSC 571 for details.)Appellant sought to place before the CCA new evidence from participants in the above offences to the effect that appellant was not present at the time of the offences or that they did not see him when the shootings occurred.

Both vehicles stopped at traffic lights whereupon appellant & at least one other male approached victim's car then pulled him from the vehicle. Aged 47 at time of offences - troubled upbringing - poor health - lengthy criminal record - priors include offences for violence, property & driving - previous imprisonment in 3 Australian states.

Victim attempted to defend himself with a clublock, which was taken from him. Whether conviction unreasonable having regard to the evidence - whether witnesses 'coached'- whether undue weight given to evidence of witnesses. RAE, Stephen John - CCA, Giles JA, Sully & Levine JJCitation: R v Rae [2001] NSWCCA 545Sentence appeal.

Evidence was received from one witness, whereupon the Crown commenced cross examination of that witness.

Tags: , ,